Skip to main content

Timeline for Square and reversed integer

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 13, 2013 at 15:06 history edited user9072
edited tags; edited tags
May 8, 2013 at 0:04 comment added ARupinski @Gerry Myerson: thanks for clearing that up. Obviously I read the formulation through too quickly without thinking about what it was asserting.
May 7, 2013 at 10:28 answer added Nilotpal Kanti Sinha timeline score: 1
May 7, 2013 at 6:27 answer added Gerry Myerson timeline score: 2
May 7, 2013 at 6:17 comment added Gerry Myerson @ARupinski, OP alleges A implies B, you present a counterexample to B implies A.
May 6, 2013 at 23:28 comment added ARupinski You claim that this is true for $m < 10^8$, but why does for example $m = 32$ work? I have that $f(32\times 32) = 4201 \neq f(32)\times f(32) = 529$ even though for 32 one has $a_0,a_1\in\{0,1,2,3\}$. Is there an extra assumption that is missing here?
May 6, 2013 at 19:24 comment added user12806 $f(87 \times 87) \neq f(87) \times f(87)$, so we have "$f(87 \times 87) = f(87) \times f(87) \implies 8,7 \in \{0,1,2,3\}$".
May 6, 2013 at 19:18 comment added Aeryk $9657 = f(7569) = f(87 \times 87) \ne f(87) \times f(87) = 78 \times 78 = 6084$.
May 6, 2013 at 18:51 history asked user12806 CC BY-SA 3.0