Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 5, 2013 at 4:11 comment added JHM It is also not unusual for the compactness assumption to be (incorrectly!) omitted in certain texts, e.g. Corollary 4.11 of Lawson's ``Quantitative theory of foliations".
Dec 5, 2013 at 4:07 comment added JHM I only mention it because there is another question floating around MO, on whether or not $R^3-0$ can be foliated by $2$-tori. There appears some vague (and unjustified) comments that the existence of such a foliation requires the total space (an open $3$-mfld) to have $\chi=0$. I find the question interesting and trying to work it out for myself.
Dec 5, 2013 at 3:44 comment added Andy Putman @J.Martel : Of course.
Dec 5, 2013 at 1:23 comment added JHM compactness of $M$ is essential in establishing the converse (left as `easy' exercise).
May 6, 2013 at 4:39 vote accept Theo Johnson-Freyd
May 5, 2013 at 20:36 history answered Andy Putman CC BY-SA 3.0