Timeline for Does an existence of large cardinals have implications in number theory or combinatorics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2020 at 4:05 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | ...link to the corresponding pdf file. | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 4:04 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | I see that this answer was recently edited to update the dead links. Just in case, here are also links to Wayback Machine: Invariant Maximal Cliques and Incompleteness, Boolean Relation Theory and Incompleteness and ... | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 1:21 | history | edited | Timothy Chow | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Updated dead hyperlinks
|
| Jan 16, 2020 at 1:17 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | Friedman continues to come up with fresh examples, although the pace at which he announces new results far outstrips the pace at which he releases proofs of his results. As of this writing, his latest announcement is this post on the Foundations of Mathematics mailing list. | |
| May 4, 2013 at 14:59 | vote | accept | Oksana Gimmel | ||
| May 4, 2013 at 0:52 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | Regarding an "explanation," see Friedman's own succinct summary of the general methodology for coming up with these statements, which I reproduced here: mathoverflow.net/questions/27864/… | |
| May 4, 2013 at 0:46 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | My favorite example of Friedman's is one that I mentioned in my answer to a related MO question mathoverflow.net/questions/1924/… . It appears at the end of Martin Davis's Notices article: ams.org/notices/200604/fea-davis.pdf | |
| May 3, 2013 at 21:49 | history | answered | aws | CC BY-SA 3.0 |