Skip to main content
deleted 74 characters in body
Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

More generally, the category of rep on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G$ with trivial central character coincides with that of the rep theory on Hilbert spaces of the locally compact group $G/Z$, here $Z$ being the center of $G$. So although, the categories are not semisimple, one can always decompose with respect to the center.

Quote from Wikipedia "There is an equivalence between (g,K)-modules and $G$-Hilbertspace reps": In 1973, Lepowsky showed that any irreducible (g,K)-module X is isomorphic to the Harish-Chandra module of an irreducible representation of G on a Hilbert space....(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harish-Chandra_module)

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

More generally, the category of rep on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G$ with trivial central character coincides with that of the rep theory on Hilbert spaces of the locally compact group $G/Z$, here $Z$ being the center of $G$. So although, the categories are not semisimple, one can always decompose with respect to the center.

Quote from Wikipedia "There is an equivalence between (g,K)-modules and $G$-Hilbertspace reps": In 1973, Lepowsky showed that any irreducible (g,K)-module X is isomorphic to the Harish-Chandra module of an irreducible representation of G on a Hilbert space....(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harish-Chandra_module)

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

More generally, the category of rep on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G$ with trivial central character coincides with that of the rep theory on Hilbert spaces of the locally compact group $G/Z$, here $Z$ being the center of $G$. So although, the categories are not semisimple, one can always decompose with respect to the center.

Quote from Wikipedia: In 1973, Lepowsky showed that any irreducible (g,K)-module X is isomorphic to the Harish-Chandra module of an irreducible representation of G on a Hilbert space....(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harish-Chandra_module)

added 232 characters in body
Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

More generally, the category of rep on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G$ with trivial central character coincides with that of the rep theory on Hilbert spaces of athe locally compact group $G/Z$, here $Z$ being the center of $G$. So although, the categories are not semisimple, one can always decompose with respect to the center.

Quote from Wikipedia "There is an equivalence between (g,K)-modules and $G$-Hilbertspace reps": In 1973, Lepowsky showed that any irreducible (g,K)-module X is isomorphic to the Harish-Chandra module of an irreducible representation of G on a Hilbert space....(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harish-Chandra_module)

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

More generally, the category of rep on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G$ with trivial central character coincides with that of the rep theory on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G/Z$, here $Z$ being the center of $G$.

Quote from Wikipedia: In 1973, Lepowsky showed that any irreducible (g,K)-module X is isomorphic to the Harish-Chandra module of an irreducible representation of G on a Hilbert space.

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

More generally, the category of rep on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G$ with trivial central character coincides with that of the rep theory on Hilbert spaces of the locally compact group $G/Z$, here $Z$ being the center of $G$. So although, the categories are not semisimple, one can always decompose with respect to the center.

Quote from Wikipedia "There is an equivalence between (g,K)-modules and $G$-Hilbertspace reps": In 1973, Lepowsky showed that any irreducible (g,K)-module X is isomorphic to the Harish-Chandra module of an irreducible representation of G on a Hilbert space....(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harish-Chandra_module)

added 433 characters in body
Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

More generally, the category of rep on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G$ with trivial central character coincides with that of the rep theory on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G/Z$, here $Z$ being the center of $G$.

Quote from Wikipedia: In 1973, Lepowsky showed that any irreducible (g,K)-module X is isomorphic to the Harish-Chandra module of an irreducible representation of G on a Hilbert space.

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

Yes, the central character of the even $K$-types is trivial, and of the odd ones is the sign character.

Also, this can easily be seen from the classification of irreducible representation on Hilbert spaces.

More generally, the category of rep on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G$ with trivial central character coincides with that of the rep theory on Hilbert spaces of a locally compact group $G/Z$, here $Z$ being the center of $G$.

Quote from Wikipedia: In 1973, Lepowsky showed that any irreducible (g,K)-module X is isomorphic to the Harish-Chandra module of an irreducible representation of G on a Hilbert space.

Source Link
Marc Palm
  • 11.2k
  • 2
  • 35
  • 92
Loading