Timeline for Non Lebesgue measurable subsets with "large" outer measure
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2010 at 14:41 | comment | added | Zev Chonoles | Ah, right - I meant Lebesgue measure in my answer, but got mixed up. Clarifying which measure you mean is a good idea, as it will help avoid confusions such as mine :) | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 14:31 | comment | added | François G. Dorais | Subsets of null sets are always Lebesgue measurable, but not necessarily Borel measurable. Perhaps you should clarify what you mean by "measurable" in your answer. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 14:31 | comment | added | Haim | Perhaps I'm missing something here, but isn't the Lebesgue measure complete? i.e. for every measurable set A with m(A)=0, each subset of A is Lebesgue-measurable with measure zero. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 14:26 | history | answered | Zev Chonoles | CC BY-SA 2.5 |