Skip to main content
added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Felix Goldberg
  • 7k
  • 4
  • 31
  • 55

Let $D$ be a $(v,k,\lambda)$-design (repeated blocks are allowed). I would like to get a lower bound on the cardinality of the union of $s$ blocks. A naive application of inclusion-exclusion gives $sk-\binom{k}{2}$ which is sometimes useful, but from the few examples I've worked out seems to be a severe underestimation of the true situation.

Has anyone treated this question befrebefore?

If it helps, we can progressively simplify to symmetric designs and then to finite projective planes (i.e. $\lambda=1$).

Let $D$ be a $(v,k,\lambda)$-design (repeated blocks are allowed). I would like to get a lower bound on the cardinality of the union of $s$ blocks. A naive application of inclusion-exclusion gives $sk-\binom{k}{2}$ which is sometimes useful, but from the few examples I've worked out seems to be a severe underestimation of the true situation.

Has anyone treated this question befre?

If it helps, we can progressively simplify to symmetric designs and then to finite projective planes (i.e. $\lambda=1$).

Let $D$ be a $(v,k,\lambda)$-design (repeated blocks are allowed). I would like to get a lower bound on the cardinality of the union of $s$ blocks. A naive application of inclusion-exclusion gives $sk-\binom{k}{2}$ which is sometimes useful, but from the few examples I've worked out seems to be a severe underestimation of the true situation.

Has anyone treated this question before?

If it helps, we can progressively simplify to symmetric designs and then to finite projective planes (i.e. $\lambda=1$).

Source Link
Felix Goldberg
  • 7k
  • 4
  • 31
  • 55

Lower bounds on cardinality of a union of blocks in a design

Let $D$ be a $(v,k,\lambda)$-design (repeated blocks are allowed). I would like to get a lower bound on the cardinality of the union of $s$ blocks. A naive application of inclusion-exclusion gives $sk-\binom{k}{2}$ which is sometimes useful, but from the few examples I've worked out seems to be a severe underestimation of the true situation.

Has anyone treated this question befre?

If it helps, we can progressively simplify to symmetric designs and then to finite projective planes (i.e. $\lambda=1$).