Timeline for Stokes theorem for manifolds with corners?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2010 at 13:38 | vote | accept | Agustí Roig | ||
| Jan 26, 2010 at 9:23 | history | edited | Agustí Roig | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 192 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2010 at 9:19 | vote | accept | Agustí Roig | ||
| Jan 26, 2010 at 13:38 | |||||
| Jan 26, 2010 at 0:39 | answer | added | Marty | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 22:39 | comment | added | Johnson Jia | You may want to take a look at Brian Conrad's notes on differential geometry: math.stanford.edu/~conrad/diffgeomPage/handouts.html | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 14:04 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | A cone is not a manifold with corners. A cone on the other hand is a stratified space, and the proof of Stokes' that Orbicular mentions works for them, and even more general objects. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 13:15 | answer | added | Lars | timeline score: 18 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 12:58 | answer | added | bavajee | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 12:04 | answer | added | Orbicular | timeline score: 25 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 12:02 | answer | added | Christian Blatter | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 10:16 | history | edited | Agustí Roig | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Jan 25, 2010 at 10:13 | comment | added | Dmitri Panov | You may find usefull the article of Joyce "On manifolds with corners" arxiv.org/abs/0910.3518. Square is considered as a manifold with corners, but the cone usually not, it seems. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 9:57 | history | asked | Agustí Roig | CC BY-SA 2.5 |