Timeline for Cohen algebra (generalization)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2013 at 1:06 | comment | added | Rina Shora | @Joseph Thanks again, this is really a nice characterization. I appreciate you help and the time you spent following these results. | |
| May 2, 2013 at 1:00 | vote | accept | Rina Shora | ||
| May 2, 2013 at 1:00 | |||||
| Apr 30, 2013 at 21:39 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8826 characters in body
|
| Apr 29, 2013 at 23:47 | comment | added | Rina Shora | Dear Alex ... Thanks for this clarification. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 11:48 | comment | added | Alex Simpson | For every measurable set $X$ there exist Borel sets $A,B$ of the same measure as $X$ with $A \subseteq X \subseteq B$. So your "random algebra" is isomorphic to the measure algebra. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18 | comment | added | Rina Shora | @Joseph Thank you for your reply. I am aware of measure algebra, but do not you think that random algebra is little bit stronger than measure algebra, because random = Bor(X)/ideal of null sets, measure algebra=measurable (Lebesgue) set of X/ideal of null set, and every Borel is measurable but not vice versa. Yes that result of true, but I thought there maybe some other results stronger that these. I got the book you recommended, it is very good one. I will be pleased to hear anything else from you. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 1:02 | history | answered | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |