Timeline for Submitting to arXiv when unaffiliated
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8 at 19:52 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Stefan Kohl♦ | ||
| Aug 21, 2010 at 3:38 | comment | added | Thierry Zell | The academic affiliation appears to be optional: it may allow to bypass the need for endorsement and thus streamline the process. As for the authorship, I imagine that the intent was to allow researchers to delegate this kind of tedious submission to their subordinates. | |
| Apr 12, 2010 at 5:25 | comment | added | Paul Delhanty | @Scott - OK understood - I will be sure to respect that. I was new to MO at that point and did not fully understand the ground rules. | |
| Jan 26, 2010 at 1:29 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | @Paul, just make sure if you post on MO about your paper, you do so as a good question! We don't want questions of the form "What do you think of my paper", or any variations, thank you! :-) | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 6:41 | comment | added | Paul Delhanty | Thank you. That's a very considered answer. I agree a balance needs to be struck. Perhaps academic affiliation is no absolute guarantee of quality though. What I might end up doing is posting a summary of the paper here on MO with a link to a PDF somewhere. Then the reputation of MO can work its magic. If the consensus is that the paper <i>is</i> junk then I will just let it fade away. On the other hand, if the consensus is generally favorable, then probably someone will be willing to endorse and submit for me. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 6:04 | history | answered | fedja | CC BY-SA 2.5 |