Timeline for Combinatorics journals processing time
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2017 at 8:21 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 5, 2017 at 2:18 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Feb 22, 2010 at 2:39 | history | edited | Douglas S. Stones |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 29, 2010 at 4:21 | vote | accept | Douglas S. Stones | ||
| Jan 26, 2010 at 0:58 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Warning: data about processing time typically means averages, not standard deviations. In my experience, the latter can be so large as to severely limit the usefulness of the former. In my opinion it is a better bet to find an editor whom you know personally and/or trust to rapidly send the paper to a competent referee. The practices of the editor count more than those of the journal itself, at least if you're counting time to acceptance (which is what most people care about the most, I think.) | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 | answer | added | Andrew Stacey | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 5:10 | history | asked | Douglas S. Stones | CC BY-SA 2.5 |