Timeline for Digital pen for math: your experiences?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2020 at 2:22 | comment | added | Alec Rhea | I think this is a good question, although I would pay big money for a program that worked similar to detexify but with notes integration, so when you draw a symbol it suggests latex symbols you may have wanted from the detexify library and allows you to use them. It would greatly simplify category theory notes, and probably notes in other disciplines too, although figuring out how to integrate super/subscripts etc would be tricky. | |
| Feb 16, 2020 at 0:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 17, 2020 at 3:51 | |||||
| Feb 16, 2020 at 0:37 | comment | added | YCor | I have doubts about the "mathematical expertise" needed for this question, notably according to the current flow of answers. | |
| Feb 16, 2020 at 0:33 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals from title
|
| Feb 16, 2020 at 0:23 | answer | added | Peter Gerdes | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 5, 2019 at 13:20 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 5, 2019 at 17:35 | |||||
| Jan 3, 2019 at 8:16 | comment | added | LSpice | @crskhr, @PeteL.Clark's comment was referring to the original version of the post, in which (1) requested that the "pen records everything you right". | |
| Nov 25, 2017 at 15:19 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 25, 2017 at 23:48 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Mar 14, 2015 at 14:32 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 15, 2011 at 14:09 | comment | added | Zoran Skoda | As long as pen writes in some graphic window it could be interchange by mouse or any other device which can control writing there. PCs are made of components from different vendors and standards. So ut must be with recording writing with voice technology as well. Any bundled solution is not a solution. | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 14:09 | comment | added | Zoran Skoda | It is disappointing "solution" to have a pen which must write on a special paper, which must use ink, and which must be the single ocmpbiantion of a software and hardware from the same company. Ideally a synchronous recording of sound plus the track of the pen needs a separate any type microphone and separate electronic pen of any company unified by a single software. | |
| Jun 11, 2011 at 15:58 | comment | added | C.S. | @B.Bischof: Well, I still can't understand Pete's comment :X) | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 23:20 | comment | added | Andrew D. King | @Matt I totally agree. Beamer is so useful, especially if you give a similar talk many times, but you can end up being really handcuffed by it, especially if the room doesn't have a good setup. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 16:17 | answer | added | Harald Hanche-Olsen | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 15:51 | history | edited | B. Bischof | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
I am dumb.
|
| Jan 25, 2010 at 15:50 | comment | added | B. Bischof | @Pete I had to read your comment about 5 times to understand. Very nice, very nice! Change made and I voted that comment up. :D | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 8:50 | answer | added | Andrew Stacey | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 7:51 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Bischof: If in addition to 1) the pen did not record anything that I wrong, I would certainly buy it. :) | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 7:06 | comment | added | Matt Noonan | In a similar vein, I've been curious about attempts at blending Beamer with blackboard talks via a pen. The one thing I really miss from transparencies is the ability to write stuff out on-the-fly on a blank. It would be great if there were a digital alternative. Re: relevancy to MO, I think mathematicians care more about this sort of half-prepared, half-live talk than most other people would. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 5:07 | comment | added | B. Bischof | No Qiaochu, it wouldn't. Recall that mathoverflow is about questions that researching mathematicians would be interested in. If I were asking about the specs of the device or how well it performs its suggest tasks then yes, superuser would be the place to go. As I am asking how mathematicians find the product to be helpful in mathematical environments, mathoverflow is the more appropriate place to ask. If you have any suggestions on how I can improve this question, I would be enthusiastic to hear them. Thanks for the suggestion though. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 4:36 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Wouldn't this question be more appropriate at superuser? | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 3:47 | history | asked | B. Bischof | CC BY-SA 2.5 |