Timeline for Can one make the category of pairs of topological spaces a model category?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2021 at 0:16 | history | edited | David White |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 29, 2013 at 20:14 | vote | accept | Joseph Victor | ||
| Apr 29, 2013 at 20:14 | vote | accept | Joseph Victor | ||
| Apr 29, 2013 at 20:14 | |||||
| Apr 29, 2013 at 18:12 | answer | added | David White | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 28, 2013 at 7:18 | answer | added | Karol Szumiło | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 28, 2013 at 6:16 | comment | added | Joseph Victor | That sounds interesting! Is there a good reference for that? Do you know what goes wrong if I restrict to subspaces or $A\to X$ a cofibration? | |
| Apr 28, 2013 at 6:14 | history | edited | Joseph Victor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Apr 28, 2013 at 5:35 | comment | added | Tyler Lawson | Are you restricting $A$ to be a subspace? If you don't, then you can use a model structure on the category of functors $\{\cdot \to \cdot\} \to X$, such as the projective or injective model structure. | |
| Apr 28, 2013 at 4:09 | history | asked | Joseph Victor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |