Timeline for Submitting to arXiv when unaffiliated
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8 at 19:52 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Stefan Kohl♦ | ||
| Apr 5, 2019 at 14:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 5, 2019 at 15:56 | |||||
| Dec 19, 2017 at 5:22 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 19, 2017 at 11:28 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2017 at 3:11 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 12, 2017 at 8:41 | |||||
| Mar 14, 2015 at 14:30 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 10, 2010 at 15:17 | comment | added | Arend Bayer | If you want mathematicians to read your papers, you should bring them in "close to journal quality" anyway. I would suggest to focus on that - once you have achieved that, it shouldn't be too hard to find an endorser. (Note that the endorser isn't vouching for the correctness of the article.) | |
| Aug 28, 2010 at 12:51 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | @Paul: I agree with this criterion: put something on arXiv only if it is close to journal quality! | |
| Aug 27, 2010 at 20:17 | comment | added | Paul Delhanty | @Gerald: I concluded that my original result was correct but irrelevant, so I decided not to publish it. There is some other stuff that I am working on, but to start with I decided that I only really needed a blog with authorative time stamps. arXiv appears to suggest to quite a lot of people close to journal quality. I didn't feel confident that I could reach that level working on my own without any peer review. Also, I wanted a lightweight process - the last think I want to be doing is bugging busy maths professors about endorsement. | |
| Aug 27, 2010 at 13:19 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | @Paul: So, what happened? | |
| Aug 27, 2010 at 9:18 | answer | added | sleepless in beantown | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 13, 2010 at 4:24 | comment | added | Paul Delhanty | @Andrew - what is Archive? | |
| Apr 13, 2010 at 4:23 | comment | added | Paul Delhanty | @Deanne - that response is kind of off topic - wont't vote it down - but I won't vote it up either. Actually, once I get the time stamp sorted, I will probably just start a blog and try to build up a small following from zero. Thankfully one does not need an endorser to open an account with Wordpress. | |
| Apr 12, 2010 at 20:24 | comment | added | The Mathemagician | One of my mentors,Dr.Melvyn Nathanson,is a HUGE advocate of publishing on Archive and he encourages everyone looking for a career in mathematics to begin publishing there.I could ask him about your question,Paul. | |
| Apr 12, 2010 at 18:04 | answer | added | Nate Eldredge | timeline score: 28 | |
| Apr 12, 2010 at 12:27 | comment | added | Deane Yang | I suggest that you also get one or two other people to check your work for both correctness and readability. | |
| Apr 12, 2010 at 5:10 | history | edited | Paul Delhanty | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
grammar s/may/can/
|
| Apr 11, 2010 at 10:34 | answer | added | Phil Gibbs | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 26, 2010 at 0:22 | vote | accept | Paul Delhanty | ||
| Jan 26, 2010 at 0:22 | comment | added | Paul Delhanty | Thanks for all the answers and comments, which were all good and helpful. The consensus seems that just endorsement without affiliation might suffice for the arXiv. So I am going to complete my paper and check the result carefully. After that, if I am confident that the result stands up, work out how to contact a respected member of the combinatorics community who might be happy to endorse my paper. I am accepting Douglas' answer because of all the helpful comments. | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 9:03 | answer | added | Andrew Stacey | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 6:04 | answer | added | fedja | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 3:37 | answer | added | Douglas S. Stones | timeline score: 18 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 3:23 | history | asked | Paul Delhanty | CC BY-SA 2.5 |