Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 26, 2013 at 21:46 history edited Malte CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Apr 26, 2013 at 21:21 history edited Malte CC BY-SA 3.0
added 157 characters in body; deleted 5 characters in body
Apr 26, 2013 at 17:41 answer added Anton Petrunin timeline score: 2
Apr 26, 2013 at 17:24 comment added Benoît Kloeckner Why should $\gamma$ disconnect your surface? think of a torus, or a hyperbolic surface with small non-separating systole.
Apr 26, 2013 at 16:41 history edited Malte CC BY-SA 3.0
added 210 characters in body
Apr 26, 2013 at 15:44 comment added Rbega In light of horse with no name's examples I guess you need to assume either that $\gamma$ is separating or $\Omega_0$ has positive genus for what I wrote to work.
Apr 26, 2013 at 15:26 comment added Asaf For negative curvature, there is the thin-thick decomposition by Margulis' lemma...
Apr 26, 2013 at 14:49 answer added horse with no name timeline score: 6
Apr 26, 2013 at 13:29 comment added Rbega I guess you could rescale the metric so you should be able to prove that $Area(\Omega_0)\geq 2\pi i_g^{-2}$. Perhaps I'm missing something here.
Apr 26, 2013 at 12:45 comment added Malte Thank you, Rbega. This, of course, doesn't take the length of $\gamma$ into account. (One should expect the volume of $\Omega_i$ to increase as $i_g \rightarrow 0$.
Apr 26, 2013 at 12:24 comment added Rbega If your on an oriented surface then doesn't Gauss-Bonnet together with your curvature bound tell you that $Area(\Omega_0)\geq 2\pi$? Here $\Omega_0$ is a component of $M\backslash \gamma$. I guess you could do better if the genus of $\Omega_0$ was known to be bigger than 1.
Apr 26, 2013 at 11:55 history asked Malte CC BY-SA 3.0