Timeline for What, precisely, is the relationship between "fields of moduli" and "moduli spaces"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2010 at 23:14 | comment | added | JSE | No, Romagny and Wewers certainly don't restrict themselves to this case. | |
| Jan 24, 2010 at 23:11 | comment | added | H. Hasson | By simple cover I mean that over every branched point there's only one ramification point, and it ramifies with multiplicity 2 (and some additional technical requirements, if we're not over C). | |
| Jan 24, 2010 at 23:05 | comment | added | JSE | It depends; what do you mean by "simple covers"? If you mean "simply branched," no -- for instance, Wewers allows an arbitrary finite group as Galois group, not just S_n. | |
| Jan 24, 2010 at 22:44 | comment | added | H. Hasson | From a cursory look it seems that he's again looking only at simple covers. Is this what he's doing, or am I missing something? | |
| Jan 24, 2010 at 22:40 | comment | added | H. Hasson | Interesting. I will take a look. | |
| Jan 24, 2010 at 22:37 | history | answered | JSE | CC BY-SA 2.5 |