Timeline for motivating geometric representation theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2013 at 14:01 | answer | added | Allen Knutson | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 4, 2013 at 13:52 | comment | added | Allen Knutson | I'm a little worried that by "geometric representation theory" you mean things like Borel-Weil, which is very much not what people who call themselves "geometric representation theorists" mean by GRT -- they mean Springer theory, quiver varieties, geometric Satake, etc. | |
| Apr 25, 2013 at 21:13 | answer | added | George Melvin | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 25, 2013 at 20:59 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Eric Larson | ||
| Apr 25, 2013 at 20:30 | answer | added | jorge vargas | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 25, 2013 at 17:02 | comment | added | Marc Palm | mathoverflow.net/questions/126474/… | |
| Apr 25, 2013 at 14:28 | answer | added | Marc Palm | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 25, 2013 at 14:12 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | As a soft question, this might be designated community-wiki? Clearly there's more than one answer. For instance, Springer theory comes to mind relative to the traditional representation theory of Weyl groups, including symmetric groups. | |
| Apr 25, 2013 at 7:55 | comment | added | Simon Wadsley | Kazhdan--Lusztig conjectures? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazhdan%E2%80%93Lusztig_polynomial | |
| Apr 25, 2013 at 4:58 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Does the geoemetric proof of Gabriel's theorem on the representation type of quivers give a good motivation? It is an immensely natural argument and gets you right there into GRT. | |
| Apr 25, 2013 at 3:42 | history | asked | Eric Larson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |