Timeline for Coequalizer in category of dg-algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 6, 2019 at 11:16 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | @VictorTC coequalizers are very complicated in general. I don't think that any property of the ground ring could simplify things. | |
May 6, 2019 at 9:54 | comment | added | Victor TC | @Fernando I apologize, I meant the coequalizer when the commutative ring is a field. | |
May 6, 2019 at 9:35 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | @VictorTC equalizers (and limits in general) are easy. The equalizer of two maps is just the kernel of the difference. | |
May 6, 2019 at 8:19 | comment | added | Victor TC | @Fernando is it also complicated to construct equalizers when the commutative ring is a field?. | |
Dec 20, 2013 at 17:27 | history | edited | David White |
Retagged because it was on the front page anyway
|
|
Apr 24, 2013 at 19:36 | vote | accept | jsfdlkdj | ||
Apr 24, 2013 at 3:17 | answer | added | Peter May | timeline score: 5 | |
Apr 23, 2013 at 20:26 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | That's extremely complicated. There's no explicit way of doing it. The existence of such colimits is via general categorical results which, in my experience, are impossible to trace back in order to recover a sensible construction. | |
Apr 23, 2013 at 19:25 | history | edited | jsfdlkdj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Apr 23, 2013 at 19:15 | history | asked | jsfdlkdj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |