Timeline for The notion of multiplicity in algebraic geometry
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2013 at 12:58 | vote | accept | Jesko Hüttenhain | ||
| Apr 23, 2013 at 15:41 | comment | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | With the notation in the definition of $\overline{\mu}$, assume $P$ is a singular point. Then in general there is an $f\in\mathcal{O}_{X,P}$ such that $\mu_f(I)=1$, but none such that $\overline{\mu}_f(I)=1$. | |
| Apr 23, 2013 at 5:31 | answer | added | Youngsu | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 23, 2013 at 3:31 | answer | added | Filippo Alberto Edoardo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 22, 2013 at 21:07 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 22, 2013 at 20:45 | comment | added | Jesko Hüttenhain | Yea, that was exactly my suspicion. I would like to know how (or rather when) it misbehaves, though - most of the time I am dealing with very forgiving kinds of schemes anyway. | |
| Apr 22, 2013 at 19:54 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | My guess is that $\mu_f$ misbehaves, but I don't know enough to say how it misbehaves. | |
| Apr 22, 2013 at 19:52 | history | asked | Jesko Hüttenhain | CC BY-SA 3.0 |