Timeline for Giving $\mathit{Top}(X,Y)$ an appropriate topology
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2022 at 13:14 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting, changed tag
|
| Apr 27, 2013 at 21:57 | answer | added | Bill Lawvere | timeline score: 21 | |
| Apr 22, 2013 at 14:55 | answer | added | Ronnie Brown | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 9:38 | vote | accept | Amr | ||
| Apr 20, 2013 at 9:38 | vote | accept | Amr | ||
| Apr 20, 2013 at 9:38 | |||||
| Apr 19, 2013 at 14:36 | comment | added | Marcos Cossarini | For the non-Hausdorff case, see ncatlab.org/nlab/show/exponential+law+for+spaces. | |
| Apr 18, 2013 at 21:21 | history | edited | Paul Taylor |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 18, 2013 at 9:44 | history | edited | Amr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Apr 18, 2013 at 9:43 | comment | added | Amr | @johnodoe Yes. I will fix this now | |
| Apr 18, 2013 at 6:11 | answer | added | johndoe | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 18, 2013 at 5:53 | comment | added | johndoe | @Amr: it seems you misplaced some * in the edited version | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 21:51 | history | edited | Amr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 635 characters in body
|
| Apr 17, 2013 at 21:43 | comment | added | Amr | @Anton Fetisov I mean the interval [0,1]. I also don't think that this case is useless. I will add a motivation to my question. | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 17:03 | comment | added | johndoe | to Anton Fetisov: why is the case I rather useless? | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 15:55 | answer | added | Daniel Barter | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 14:20 | answer | added | Paul Taylor | timeline score: 25 | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 13:25 | answer | added | Fernando | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 13:04 | comment | added | Anton Fetisov | If $\mathbb{I}$ denotes $[0,1]$, then I don't know the answer, but this case is rather useless. For $\mathbb{I}$ a general topological space, the answer is no. Such topology can be given iff $X$ is locally compact. If you are fine with smaller subcategory of $\mathcal{T}op$, then there is a classical solution: work in a category of compactly generated hausdorff spaces and equip $Hom(X,Y)$ with compact-open topology. | |
| Apr 17, 2013 at 12:31 | history | asked | Amr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |