Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Jul 16, 2014 at 18:47 comment added Charles Rezk @Ralph: The "equational criterion" can be stated approximately as follows: $M$ is flat iff any map to it from a finitely presented module $N$ factors through a f.g. free module. (The statement of the equational criterion that I usually see is what you get if you rewrite what I just said in terms of the finite presentation $R^p\to R^q$ of $N$, instead of $N$ itself, which can then be written in terms of solving some linear systems of linear equations with variables in $R$ and $M$.)
May 5, 2013 at 8:08 answer added Martin Brandenburg timeline score: 3
May 2, 2013 at 21:34 vote accept Ralph
Apr 18, 2013 at 15:47 answer added David White timeline score: 7
Apr 17, 2013 at 22:50 comment added darij grinberg Ralph: I hesitated to post it as answer exactly because I wasn't sure whether Higgins ever used it. Weirdly enough, the flat version of PBW appeared on Wikipedia, with reference to Higgins... Someone's been doing original research, apparently :)
Apr 17, 2013 at 19:11 comment added Ralph @darij: As far as I can see, L-G is neither used in Higgins paper nor does Higgins treat the flat case. If I'm not missing something this is quite surprising because the flat case follows immediately from Higgins results and L-G. Higgins paper was submitted 1968 while the paper from Govorov was published 1965 and that of Lazard 1969. So it unclear, if Higgins should had known L-G when he was writing his paper. In any case L-G is an interesting application on the flat Birkhoff-Witt. Wouldn't you like to post this as an answer ?
Apr 17, 2013 at 18:35 comment added Ralph @James: What is the equational criterion ?
Apr 17, 2013 at 9:15 comment added JBorger Closely related to the G-L theorem is the equational criterion for flatness, which I really like. It provides a nice counterpoint to the more common category-theoretic or homological points of view on flatness.
Apr 17, 2013 at 8:37 answer added Olivier timeline score: 10
Apr 17, 2013 at 4:05 answer added user30180 timeline score: 3
Apr 17, 2013 at 1:48 comment added darij grinberg (Probably it's part of the proof that Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt itself, not just some relative version, holds for Lie algebras which are flat as modules over the base ring. I have not studied this proof but I think it should be in P. J. Higgins, Baer Invariants and the Birkhoff-Witt Theorem, Journal of Algebra 11, pp. 469-482 (1969).)
Apr 17, 2013 at 1:45 comment added darij grinberg YMMV on whether this is interesting, but it helps generalize some relative version of Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt to Lie algebras which are flat as modules over rings: mathoverflow.net/questions/65675/…
Apr 16, 2013 at 23:16 history asked Ralph CC BY-SA 3.0