Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 11, 2013 at 16:16 comment added IMeasy Yes, I should have said canonical. Universal has a categorical meaning which is not true here. Thank you!
Apr 11, 2013 at 16:01 comment added David Carchedi By the way, in some more detail, there is a canonical map $$\left[X//G\right] \to \left[pt//G\right]=BG$$, which is faithful. This is how you get a $G$-torsor out of a map $$S \to \left[X//G\right]$$ (it is classified by the composition into $\left[pt//G\right].$) I should be a bit careful, since I am used to working with topological stacks, but I think everything should work.
Apr 11, 2013 at 15:57 comment added David Carchedi What do you mean by "universal"? To me, universal means that every family is a pullback of it, which is not true here, but is locally- that's why I said locally universal. If instead, you mean canonical, then sure.
Apr 11, 2013 at 15:18 comment added IMeasy But I still don't understand one thing. By pulling back the universal family from $[X//G]$ to $X$, don't I get a "universal" $G$-invariant family on $X$?
Apr 11, 2013 at 15:13 comment added IMeasy Ok let's say that I composed with a forgetful functor $f: Groupoids \to Sets$.... :) Just kidding, it is a good remark, I edited. That's more or less what I felt: that I can lift the map $S$-globally iff the torsor $X \to [X//G]$ is trivial over the image of $S$.
Apr 11, 2013 at 15:05 vote accept IMeasy
Apr 11, 2013 at 15:05 vote accept IMeasy
Apr 11, 2013 at 15:05
Apr 11, 2013 at 13:24 history answered David Carchedi CC BY-SA 3.0