Timeline for Possible reasons why the image of 0 in the modular parametrization would always be O for a family of quadratic twists of elliptic curves
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2013 at 1:57 | vote | accept | stl | ||
| Apr 5, 2013 at 1:44 | comment | added | stl | I calculated the Tamagawa numbers, and their product is always at least 16. There are a lot of primes of bad reduction for the curves I'm considering. Although I'm still interested in a proof that isn't conditional on BSD, this does give me an intuitive explanation. Thanks! | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 8:36 | history | answered | g6hq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |