Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 22, 2010 at 20:05 answer added David E Speyer timeline score: 1
Jan 22, 2010 at 18:31 answer added Pete L. Clark timeline score: 3
Jan 22, 2010 at 18:13 answer added Theo Johnson-Freyd timeline score: 2
Jan 22, 2010 at 14:59 comment added Hans-Peter Stricker That's right...
Jan 22, 2010 at 14:54 comment added David E Speyer Just to check, by an elementary map of models you mean the definition here ncatlab.org/nlab/show/elementary+embedding , right?
Jan 22, 2010 at 14:01 vote accept Hans-Peter Stricker
Jan 22, 2010 at 13:51 comment added Qiaochu Yuan I don't follow. The word "same" has meaning only in context, and in the context of category theory, "same" means isomorphic. (Or equivalent.) If you aren't working within the context of category theory, then you should say so (and maybe not use the word "category" either).
Jan 22, 2010 at 13:44 answer added Joel David Hamkins timeline score: 3
Jan 22, 2010 at 13:38 vote accept Hans-Peter Stricker
Jan 22, 2010 at 14:01
Jan 22, 2010 at 13:25 comment added Hans-Peter Stricker Can two isomorphic abstract structures (only objects and arrows) be not the same? To talk at large: Isn't isomorphism a relation between two structures with at least one of them "concrete"? (This sums up in the question "What is 'abstract', what is 'concrete'?")
Jan 22, 2010 at 13:18 comment added Qiaochu Yuan That is not a meaningful statement until you specify what you mean by "the same." Do you want a stricter or a looser notion than isomorphism? (For example, in practice most category theorists are happy with equivalence.)
Jan 22, 2010 at 13:16 comment added Hans-Peter Stricker That's the point: are two isomorphic (abstract) categories the same?
Jan 22, 2010 at 13:09 comment added Qiaochu Yuan You should probably specify what you mean by "the same."
Jan 22, 2010 at 13:00 history asked Hans-Peter Stricker CC BY-SA 2.5