Timeline for How much of a variety can be reconstructed from codimension-zero data?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Mar 24, 2013 at 14:52 | history | edited | Dmitry Vaintrob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added text after "edit"
|
| Mar 24, 2013 at 14:46 | answer | added | Dmitry Vaintrob | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 24, 2013 at 11:38 | comment | added | user30035 | PS if you take any smooth surface then removing finitely many points won't change the sections (because zeros of sections show up in codim 1). I don't know what DG means though so I don't even know if this observation is of relevance. | |
| Mar 24, 2013 at 11:36 | comment | added | user30035 | It's not immediately clear (although perhaps it is possible to make clear) how you can "know" all finite subsets of $X$ without knowing $X$. More details in the q maybe? | |
| Mar 24, 2013 at 7:29 | history | edited | Dmitry Vaintrob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edits in text + changed title.
|
| Mar 24, 2013 at 7:22 | history | asked | Dmitry Vaintrob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |