Timeline for Consistency of many Erdos cardinals
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 2, 2013 at 14:17 | answer | added | Philip Welch | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 30, 2013 at 0:51 | comment | added | Bill Mitchell | Of course if $\kappa$ is Ramsey then $V_\kappa$ satisfies that every $\kappa(\alpha)$ exists, so a Ramsey cardinal is enough (and much more than enough) to get this. I suspect that "$\kappa(\alpha)$ for every $\alpha$ is is not equivalent to anything with a simpler statement. | |
Mar 20, 2013 at 18:00 | comment | added | Tim Mercure | Sort of, ultimately I'm curious about the strength of various sharps existing (or all sharps existing). I was hoping that if there was a paper out there looking at a class of Erdos cardinals it would be a good starting point, since having $\kappa(\alpha)$ for all alpha means that every set of ordinals has a sharp. But this seems like overkill: if $a\subseteq \alpha$ we only need $\kappa \to (\omega_1)^{< \omega}_{2^{\vert \alpha \vert}}$ for $a^\sharp$ which seems much weaker than $\exists \beta \enspace \kappa(\beta)>2^{\vert \alpha \vert}$, though perhaps the universal assertions coincide. | |
Mar 20, 2013 at 2:05 | comment | added | Ali Enayat | Since every (uncountable) measurable cardinal is an Erdős cardinal, a safe upper bound to "$\kappa(\alpha)$ exists for each $\alpha$ is "the measurable cardinals are cofinal in the ordinals". Jech's text, as well as Kanamori's has the full details. Are you looking for sharper upper bounds? | |
Mar 19, 2013 at 18:05 | history | asked | Tim Mercure | CC BY-SA 3.0 |