Timeline for Does there exist an $A$ and $\mathfrak{su}(2) \subset B$ such that $\mathfrak{su}(3) \simeq A \otimes B$
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2010 at 8:32 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | What does FIIW mean, Mariano ? | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 4:51 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | FIIW, my comment above refers to an old, rather different version of the question. @Dyke: it tends to be not a good idea to change questions like that... | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 3:35 | comment | added | Dyke Acland | ... where by embedding I mean linear not multiplicative. | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 3:30 | comment | added | Dyke Acland | I was looking for an embedding of the coordinate ring of $SU(2)$ into the coordinate ring of $SU(3)$, and thought I find one using a dual map | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 3:23 | vote | accept | Dyke Acland | ||
| Jan 21, 2010 at 2:33 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | This is one of those questions where I wish the poster had said how they came across the question, since I simply can't imagine how it happened. What question about $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ could possibly be hard enough to justify all of this? | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 1:46 | answer | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 1:42 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Best. Title. Ever. You realize that it's unreadable, right? | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 1:37 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 1:35 | history | edited | Dyke Acland | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 63 characters in body; edited title; edited title
|
| Jan 21, 2010 at 1:24 | answer | added | Steve Huntsman | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 1:23 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Does looking at the dimensions give you any information? | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 1:17 | history | asked | Dyke Acland | CC BY-SA 2.5 |