Skip to main content

Timeline for Group Structure on CP^infinty

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 18, 2021 at 18:28 comment added Daniel Asimov S<sup>7</sup> does not support a homotopy-associative H-space structure. I.M. James proves (Trans. AMS, March 1957) in "Multiplication on Spheres (II)", Theorem 1.4: "There exists no homotopy-associative multiplication on S<sup>n</sup> unless n = 1 or 3."
Jun 16, 2011 at 9:20 answer added Grigory M timeline score: 3
Jan 21, 2010 at 21:07 vote accept Justin Curry
Jan 21, 2010 at 21:06 vote accept Justin Curry
Jan 21, 2010 at 21:07
Jan 21, 2010 at 21:06 vote accept Justin Curry
Jan 21, 2010 at 21:06
Jan 21, 2010 at 21:06 vote accept Justin Curry
Jan 21, 2010 at 21:06
Jan 21, 2010 at 8:58 answer added Oren Ben-Bassat timeline score: 3
Jan 21, 2010 at 8:49 answer added Andrew Stacey timeline score: 13
Jan 21, 2010 at 4:02 answer added algori timeline score: 11
Jan 21, 2010 at 2:22 comment added Jason DeVito - on hiatus Thanks for the clarification! I wasn't sure about associativity (I'm not so sure why I DIDN'T think octonionic multiplication would give it an H-space structure - just shows I STILL have no intuition about the octonians!).
Jan 21, 2010 at 1:53 comment added Charles Siegel $S^7$ does support an H-space structure. Give it as the unit octonians, the only thing that fails to hold exactly is associativity, but it holds up to homotopy. The spheres that admit H-space structures are precisely the unit vectors in a normed division algebra. It's a theorem of Adams that these are the only ones.
Jan 21, 2010 at 1:12 comment added Jason DeVito - on hiatus For 3., see mathoverflow.net/questions/11117/… For 2, S^7 doesn't support a group structure. I don't THINK it supports an H-space structure either, but that I'm much less sure about.
Jan 21, 2010 at 0:27 history asked Justin Curry CC BY-SA 2.5