Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 12, 2021 at 9:55 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Stefan Kohl
May 29, 2014 at 15:06 comment added Geoff Robinson @Terry Tao : Thanks a lot. While my comment above predates the MO 164092 post, it is good to have a reference to it being known to Ramanujan. There seems to be no reason Euler wny Euler couldn't have proved it.
May 29, 2014 at 14:45 comment added Terry Tao Related: mathoverflow.net/questions/164092/…
Mar 16, 2013 at 18:31 comment added Geoff Robinson @i707107 :OK, thanks for clarifying.
Mar 16, 2013 at 17:21 comment added Sungjin Kim @Geoff: Of course I use zeta values at 2 and 4. I tried to show another expression.
Mar 16, 2013 at 14:51 comment added Geoff Robinson @i707107: Are you saying that you can derive that formula without using values of $\zeta$ at all, or that you can calculate it from $\zeta(2)$ alone?
Mar 16, 2013 at 4:24 comment added Sungjin Kim @Francois: A typo, should be $\zeta(4)/\zeta^2(2)$.
Mar 16, 2013 at 4:22 comment added Sungjin Kim @Geoff: Another way of seeing this: $\sum_{(a,b)=1} \frac{1}{a^2b^2}=\frac{5}{2}$.
Mar 16, 2013 at 1:01 comment added Geoff Robinson @Francois: I do not know. I think that there are quite a few instances in number theory where computations which eventually have a rational answer require $\pi$ in an apparently essential fashion along the way.
Mar 16, 2013 at 0:18 comment added François G. Dorais Neat. Is there an easier way to see that $\zeta(4)/\zeta(2) = 5/2$?
Mar 15, 2013 at 21:27 history answered Geoff Robinson CC BY-SA 3.0