Timeline for Char $p$ representations of $SL_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$ and $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2013 at 16:12 | vote | accept | mcampo | ||
| Mar 16, 2013 at 13:12 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @wccanard: Steinberg's tensor product theorem only becomes relevant for the groups over larger finite fields than the prime field (and in this rank 1 case actually goes back to much earlier work of Brauer-Nesbitt). | |
| Mar 16, 2013 at 13:09 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Mar 15, 2013 at 11:07 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 10:25 | comment | added | Nick Gill | Off-topic: One hour later I just understood the pun in the moniker @wccanard. I like it! | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 9:58 | comment | added | Nick Gill | Section 5.4 of Kleidman & Liebeck should shed light on this question. They deal with all finite groups of Lie type, and also explain Steinberg's tensor product theorem, as per the comment of @wccanard. I don't know whether STPT quite answers your question as it gives a decomposition by tensors (as the name suggests), and I'm not sure if that's what you mean when you say "which of these appear". Still, it's a good first place to look. If you need an e-copy email me. | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 7:47 | comment | added | user30035 | Steinberg's tensor product theorem? | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 1:59 | history | edited | mcampo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 142 characters in body
|
| Mar 15, 2013 at 1:27 | history | asked | mcampo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |