Timeline for The Work of Pierre Deligne
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24 at 13:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 31 at 3:07 | |||||
| Feb 18, 2015 at 3:01 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 18, 2015 at 15:07 | |||||
| Feb 9, 2015 at 21:13 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 10, 2015 at 0:07 | |||||
| Sep 25, 2013 at 3:45 | comment | added | user40463 | Perhaps the talk by Luc Illusie at the upcoming Deligne Day festival October 5 in New York ( see <a href="deligneday-morning-eorg.eventbrite.com/">Deligne Day Morning Session</a> ) will give some specific answers? | |
| Aug 11, 2013 at 8:03 | comment | added | al-Hwarizmi | The answer is clear but at least as ambigious as the question is: all best ideas which Deligne thought but kept for himself in mind and never published. | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 17:39 | comment | added | anon | @ o-o'HO2. Only five out of thirteen Abel prize winners are Fields medalists, so that is not a very good predictor. | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 16:04 | comment | added | Rodrigo A. Pérez | Congratulations to Deligne on the Abel Prize, and to o-o'HO2 on predicting it! | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 15:08 | comment | added | user32199 | Gowers writes: "While one never knows who will win the Abel Prize in any given year, it was virtually inevitable that Deligne would win it in due course, so today's announcement is about as small a surprise as such announcements can be." abelprize.no/c57681/binfil/download.php?tid=57753 | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 14:50 | comment | added | user32199 | This year's prize: abelprize.no | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 14:48 | comment | added | user32199 | In trying to predict this year's prize, I searched Wikipedia for Fields medalists over 65 who hadn't yet won the Abel prize. Deligne looked like a good candidate. So then I looked for a question to ask. | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 14:40 | comment | added | user32199 | @Alain Valette: I have rewritten the question in present tense, if that was what you were commenting on. | |
| Mar 20, 2013 at 14:38 | history | edited | user32199 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Mar 15, 2013 at 9:23 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan♦ | ||
| Mar 14, 2013 at 15:06 | comment | added | ACL | The proof that the Weil conjectures implies the Ramanujan conjecture on coefficients of modular forms only exists as a Bourbaki Seminar. Serre wrote a few times (as a footnote in his Course in Arithmetic, or in his Complete Works) that he regrets this. Around 10 years ago, Brian Conrad had undertaken to write a book on the topic, but I don't think that the book has appeared (yet). | |
| Mar 14, 2013 at 14:40 | comment | added | Alain Valette | I wonder how Deligne will feel if he reads that question... | |
| Mar 14, 2013 at 14:26 | comment | added | DamienC | Is this question appropriate for mathoverflow? I personnally believe not: what kind of answer can one expect? | |
| Mar 14, 2013 at 13:52 | history | edited | André Henriques | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body; added 7 characters in body
|
| Mar 14, 2013 at 12:14 | history | asked | user32199 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |