Skip to main content
fixed grammar
Source Link

In analogy with the notion of normal closure in group theory, the smallest ideal of ${\mathfrak g}$ containing the subalgebra ${\mathfrak m}$ is indeed called the ideal closure of ${\mathfrak m}$ and denoted by ${\mathfrak m}^{\mathfrak g}$. This terminology is rather diffused in the literature: for instance, you can find it in many papers by Amayo, Stewart, Towers, etc.

In analogy with the notion of normal closure in group theory, the smallest ideal of ${\mathfrak g}$ containing the subalgebra ${\mathfrak m}$ is indeed called the ideal closure of ${\mathfrak m}$ and denoted by ${\mathfrak m}^{\mathfrak g}$. This terminology is rather diffused in the literature: for instance, you can find it many papers by Amayo, Stewart, Towers, etc.

In analogy with the notion of normal closure in group theory, the smallest ideal of ${\mathfrak g}$ containing the subalgebra ${\mathfrak m}$ is indeed called the ideal closure of ${\mathfrak m}$ and denoted by ${\mathfrak m}^{\mathfrak g}$. This terminology is rather diffused in the literature: for instance, you can find it in many papers by Amayo, Stewart, Towers, etc.

Source Link

In analogy with the notion of normal closure in group theory, the smallest ideal of ${\mathfrak g}$ containing the subalgebra ${\mathfrak m}$ is indeed called the ideal closure of ${\mathfrak m}$ and denoted by ${\mathfrak m}^{\mathfrak g}$. This terminology is rather diffused in the literature: for instance, you can find it many papers by Amayo, Stewart, Towers, etc.