Timeline for Cohomology with compact support and the nerve of a recouvrement
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2013 at 14:26 | comment | added | Rajkarov | I think if we pute the addionnal condition : a) For all $s,t\in Y$, the sub-complexes $X_{s}$ and $X{t}$ are isomorphic. b) $X$ is chamber complexe. Then the formula is true. | |
| Mar 12, 2013 at 14:08 | comment | added | Rajkarov | Thank you Ricardo, but the formula is true for some particular examples. For example, if $X=\mathbb{Z}$ with vertex vertex $w\in\mathbb{Z}$ and edges $\{n,n+1\}$, and the recouvrement is by the edges $\{n,n+1\}$. The formula is also true for another complicated examples : one dimensional complexes above the Bruhat-Tits tree of the p-adique group $PGL(2,F)$. | |
| Mar 11, 2013 at 23:10 | comment | added | Ricardo Andrade | By the way, here is an interesting common example. When each $X_s$ is contractible, then $X\simeq Y$ and so the cohomology of $X$ is isomorphic to the cohomology of $Y$. Nevertheless, their cohomologies with compact support may still be quite different. | |
| Mar 11, 2013 at 23:05 | comment | added | Ricardo Andrade | Either I am misunderstanding something, or the answer is obviously no. Take $X=S^1$ triangulated with three 1-simplices. Consider $Y=\Delta^1$, let $X_0$ be some 1-simplex of $X$, and let $X_1$ be the union of the other two 1-simplices of $X$. Then $H^1_c(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, yet each of $X_0$, $X_1$, $X_0 \cap X_1$, and $Y$ has no cohomology in degree 1 (and $Y$ is compact). Nevertheless, for results related to what you are asking, perhaps you want to look at some kind of Mayer-Vietoris spectral sequence. However, such a spectral sequence usually does not directly involve the cohomology of $Y$. | |
| Mar 11, 2013 at 22:30 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 11, 2013 at 21:31 | history | edited | AFK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
replaced the french word "recouvrement" by "covering"; deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 11, 2013 at 17:19 | comment | added | user9072 | I retagged this question (not sure if overly well though), but then I still think it is an improvement over the old tag, which was '10'. I am not sure this is what happened, but perhaps: please do not use the numbers written next to the tags instaed of the name of the tag itself. The number (in the selection list) indicates only the number of times the tag was used so far it is not 'the number of the tag'. Using it as tag thus makes little sense. | |
| Mar 11, 2013 at 17:15 | history | edited | user9072 |
tags
|
|
| Mar 11, 2013 at 14:57 | history | asked | Rajkarov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |