Timeline for Exponential sums and binary expansions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 12, 2013 at 7:22 | vote | accept | Jochen Wengenroth | ||
Mar 12, 2013 at 7:17 | comment | added | Jochen Wengenroth | Your way to prove the identity is certainly better. | |
Mar 12, 2013 at 4:48 | answer | added | Michael Albert | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 12, 2013 at 2:52 | comment | added | Michael Albert | I'm not sure if the $z_{2n}$ identity is correctly explained (it is correct) -- it seems rather to follow from the fact that in general the sum of consecutive even and odd terms in $z_{2n}$ is equal to $(1 + e^x)$ times a single term contributing to $z_n$ rather than a matching between the first half and the second half. But perhaps I'm missing something. | |
Mar 11, 2013 at 23:04 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | The m.se reference is to math.stackexchange.com/questions/324496/binary-expansions where there is an open bounty on the question. | |
Mar 11, 2013 at 15:32 | history | edited | Jochen Wengenroth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
correced $n/2-1$ to $n/2 +1$
|
Mar 11, 2013 at 7:19 | history | asked | Jochen Wengenroth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |