Timeline for What goes wrong for the Sobolev embeddings at $k=n/p$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 at 14:57 | vote | accept | Chris Gerig | ||
| Mar 12, 2013 at 16:59 | answer | added | Connor Mooney | timeline score: 20 | |
| Mar 11, 2013 at 23:12 | comment | added | Spencer | I'm not sure I quite appreciate exactly what is being asked. You lay out two cases and then say that what is essentially just a third case is an example of the other two not working. You say that the Sobolev embedding theorem "fails" or "goes wrong" when $k=n/p$, but one might say that it is simply neither of the two cases you lay out at the start. Nothing "fails", it just happens to be its own special case. | |
| Mar 11, 2013 at 22:28 | history | edited | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 111 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2013 at 20:03 | history | edited | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 314 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 9, 2013 at 7:45 | comment | added | Denis Serre | actually, the embedding holds true in one critical case, namely $p=1$, $k=n$. | |
| Mar 8, 2013 at 22:09 | history | asked | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |