Timeline for Fuzzy Logic in Finance
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2021 at 13:31 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 15, 2021 at 9:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 25, 2021 at 3:04 | |||||
| Dec 19, 2017 at 13:03 | answer | added | Yi Xie | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 6:56 | comment | added | Gil Kalai | I think the problem is not that much with the question as it is with fuzzy logic itself (see wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_logic ). It is a mathematical theory, famous in other areas, toward which mathematicians (including me) are rather skeptical. So perhaps a better (yet boarder and vaguer) question is: Is fuzzy logic interesting? | |
| Jan 21, 2010 at 4:56 | history | edited | Anand | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 202 characters in body
|
| Jan 20, 2010 at 19:56 | comment | added | Anton Geraschenko | I agree that this isn't a good question as written. Without any indication of why you'd expect an interesting answer, it feels like a random "Is there a relationship between X and Y?" question. It's not clear why the question is being asked or what the asker hopes to get out of it. If I weren't a moderator or if there were already some close votes, I would vote to close until the question was edited to include more explanation (like what Theo suggested). | |
| Jan 20, 2010 at 17:59 | comment | added | Dan Piponi | @Zev: if by non-standard analysis you mean working in the reals extended by some nilpotent elements, then yes, that's extremely useful and applicable. | |
| Jan 20, 2010 at 15:51 | comment | added | Zev Chonoles | I've also been told that non-standard analysis apparently has some applications! | |
| Jan 20, 2010 at 15:49 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | I agree somewhat with Charles. To be a good MO question, I would hope the poster would describe fuzzy logic, describe their thoughts on its applications to finance, etc. | |
| Jan 20, 2010 at 11:42 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Si, it is: #12401. Why do you think it's not a good MO question? | |
| Jan 20, 2010 at 11:36 | answer | added | vonjd | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 20, 2010 at 10:43 | answer | added | The Bridge | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 20, 2010 at 10:14 | comment | added | Charles Stewart | -1: This is not a MO question! | |
| Jan 20, 2010 at 9:41 | history | asked | Anand | CC BY-SA 2.5 |