Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 22, 2010 at 2:54 comment added Bjorn Poonen The corrected curve has no $2$-adic points. In fact, even the genus 1 curve it maps to has no $2$-adic points. Proof: The quartic is $-1$ mod 4 whenever $x$ is in $\mathbb{Z}_2$. Because of the $x \mapsto 1/x$ symmetry, there aren't any points with $x \in \mathbb{Q}_2$ either.
Jan 21, 2010 at 17:18 comment added Kevin Buzzard Update: David fixed the sign error. Thanks David. So now Bjorn's comments don't apply because unfortunately the genus 1 curve y^2=f(x) has (for me at least) no obvious rational points at all. There are standard ways of analysing this curve but we have to wait until someone applies them. First thing to do is perhaps to check for no p-adic points for primes p of bad reduction.
Jan 21, 2010 at 17:05 history edited David E Speyer CC BY-SA 2.5
edited body
Jan 21, 2010 at 16:31 history edited David E Speyer CC BY-SA 2.5
added 6 characters in body
Jan 21, 2010 at 15:47 history edited David E Speyer CC BY-SA 2.5
added 196 characters in body
Jan 20, 2010 at 22:01 comment added Kevin Buzzard Hold your horses everyone. Hasn't David made a sign error? y^2=-RHS is the relevant equation, right? @David: I don't think this will pan out, even with the sign fix. However trying something with small period bigger than 1 is probably worth doing.
Jan 20, 2010 at 2:21 comment added Bjorn Poonen There are no rational points other than $(0,\pm 1)$. Your curve has the form $y^2=f(x^2)$. So it maps to the genus 1 curve $y^2=f(x)$, whose smooth projective model has 4 obvious rational points (above $x=0$ and $x=\infty$). There are no others since Magma says that its Jacobian (which is the same curve) has rank 0 and torsion subgroup of size 4.
Jan 20, 2010 at 1:23 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez apart from (0,1), I guess
Jan 20, 2010 at 0:59 history answered David E Speyer CC BY-SA 2.5