Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 19, 2013 at 14:48 vote accept mt_christo
Mar 12, 2013 at 22:33 history edited mt_christo
edited tags
Mar 11, 2013 at 21:38 vote accept mt_christo
Mar 12, 2013 at 22:33
Mar 5, 2013 at 13:38 comment added Gerald Edgar Perhaps begin with Mandelbot's paper, "How Long is the Coast of Britain?"
Mar 5, 2013 at 10:56 comment added Per Alexandersson It sounds a bit like a multi-fractal, (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multifractal_system) which has "mixed" fractal dimensions. If your data do not have sufficient resolution, it might be an artifact that it eventually becomes zero. Now, some DLA-systems (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion-limited_aggregation) have something similar happening in them, if I recall correctly.
Mar 5, 2013 at 2:21 answer added BSteinhurst timeline score: 2
Mar 5, 2013 at 1:30 comment added mt_christo Sure - I am calculating number (N) of segments of equal length needed to cover the set as function of size of the segment (e). (explained here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_dimension) Then I plot it in double-log coordinates. Theoretically, slope of that curve as it approaches 0 is the fractal dimension of the set. But I have a finite set, and the overall curve is a polygonal chain. Basically, what I am asking is - what could be the intuition behind that? Any literature on such applications of fractal analysis?
Mar 4, 2013 at 21:05 comment added Robert Israel Please explain more precisely what you mean. What are $N$ and $e$? If it's a finite set, it's certainly not a fractal.
Mar 4, 2013 at 20:43 history asked mt_christo CC BY-SA 3.0