Timeline for Geometric treatment of the Ward-Takahashi identity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 3, 2016 at 2:13 | history | suggested | Bruno Le Floch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
LaTeX typo
|
| Sep 3, 2016 at 1:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 3, 2016 at 2:13 | |||||
| Mar 13, 2013 at 12:30 | comment | added | user1504 | @JeffHarvey All true. I've only sketched out the basic idea above. The OP didn't write enough for me to bother with more than that. | |
| Mar 13, 2013 at 1:03 | comment | added | Jeff Harvey | In many cases no invariant measure exists. There are anomalies. The passage from finite dimensional integrals to path integrals is more subtle than you indicate here. | |
| Feb 26, 2013 at 19:57 | history | edited | user1504 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Feb 26, 2013 at 19:51 | history | answered | user1504 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |