Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 21, 2013 at 2:17 history closed user9072
Henry Cohn
user6976
Mark Meckes
Nate Eldredge
off topic
Feb 20, 2013 at 19:57 comment added rptr OK, I am asking a follow up question on academia.stackexchange. Here: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8111/…
Feb 20, 2013 at 14:02 comment added user9072 This question is in no way specific to mathematics. As such it is not on-topic here. Gerhard Paseman mentioned the appropriate site. (Except if it should ask also for individual postings of such reports, but first it does not seem like this and sencond this would not be a good question either.) Voted to close
Feb 20, 2013 at 7:16 comment added Delio Mugnolo ...but maybe a decent substitute for a survey without theorems and proofs. That said, I am almost sure that the european equivalent of NSF reports are not public.
Feb 20, 2013 at 6:52 comment added David Roberts This is an interesting point: it is various publishers' stance that instead of making final articles open access if they are funded by public money, the reports (as mentioned here) should be made more prominent and/or publicly available. I hardly think that an NSF report is a substitute for an article with theorems and proofs...
Feb 20, 2013 at 6:25 comment added rptr @Teo. So you mean that they are not public data?
Feb 20, 2013 at 5:40 comment added Will Jagy Lewis Black starts at minute 38: c-spanvideo.org/program/186191-1
Feb 20, 2013 at 4:48 comment added Gerhard Paseman Interesting question. While I hope it garners some answers here, I suspect that academia.stackexchange (or even a few web searches) will be more likely to answer this than this forum will. Gerhard "Let's Wait And See Anyway" Paseman, 2013.02.19
Feb 20, 2013 at 4:27 history asked rptr CC BY-SA 3.0