Timeline for Efficient computation of "discrete infimal convolution"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2016 at 12:07 | vote | accept | Noah Stein | ||
| Feb 24, 2016 at 17:07 | comment | added | Noah Stein | @BillBradley: Thanks. By the way, that paper is by the same Oliver. :-) | |
| Feb 24, 2016 at 4:16 | comment | added | Bill Bradley | Here's a paper on infimal convolution with a pretty excellent review of the literature, asserting that the problem is open (as of 2015). (The paper's actual contribution is the same $p$-norm convolution trick that Oliver and others have suggested.) | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 15:03 | comment | added | Noah Stein | Regarding the etiquette of answering my own question in this way: do I accept this answer because it shows the problem is considered open, which is as far as MO is intended to go? Or not because I would still be happy for someone to answer it? | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 15:03 | history | answered | Noah Stein | CC BY-SA 3.0 |