Timeline for Covering of Verma modules by translation of a dominant Verma module
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2013 at 17:33 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 105 characters in body
|
| Feb 16, 2013 at 17:33 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @Ben: The direct method you use looks OK, so I'll edit my comments a bit further. | |
| Feb 16, 2013 at 16:28 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | Jim- Do you think there's something wrong with the direct proof given in my answer? The projective functors used there are translation functors. I also think the OP is just being sloppy about the distinction between translation and projective functors. I think a lot of people say "translation functors" nowadays when they really mean "projective functors." | |
| Feb 16, 2013 at 16:21 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 570 characters in body
|
| Feb 14, 2013 at 16:32 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Feb 14, 2013 at 13:54 | history | answered | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |