Timeline for Resolution of singularities of this cubic surface?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2013 at 17:50 | comment | added | Peter Samuelson | I think you're right - I'd also be interested in hearing about other interpretations of this surface (or references). | |
| Feb 14, 2013 at 10:18 | comment | added | M P | It seems that your surface the Cayley cubic: there are a lot of interpretations of the Cayley cubic! | |
| Feb 14, 2013 at 4:25 | history | edited | Peter Samuelson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 238 characters in body
|
| Feb 14, 2013 at 4:11 | history | edited | Peter Samuelson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Feb 14, 2013 at 4:10 | comment | added | Peter Samuelson | That's what I get for writing the relation from memory - there is indeed a $-4$ term. | |
| Feb 14, 2013 at 3:53 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | (I compute $f(x,y,z)$ with your trace functions and I get $4$, not zero. Are you sure?) | |
| Feb 14, 2013 at 3:11 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | A blow-up on the origin (in your first presentation) resolves it, no? | |
| Feb 14, 2013 at 2:49 | history | asked | Peter Samuelson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |