Timeline for 2-Wasserstein (optimal transport) and extension to the set of all signed measures
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2021 at 9:32 | answer | added | leo monsaingeon | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Nov 9, 2018 at 15:25 | history | suggested | leo monsaingeon |
added the tag optimal transportation
|
|
| Nov 9, 2018 at 15:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 9, 2018 at 15:25 | |||||
| Feb 2, 2016 at 1:57 | answer | added | mcuturi | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 25, 2015 at 17:56 | history | edited | passerby51 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Oct 22, 2015 at 19:48 | answer | added | Vladimir Zolotov | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 12, 2013 at 7:15 | comment | added | Dirk | Related question: mathoverflow.net/questions/120291/… | |
| Feb 12, 2013 at 4:21 | comment | added | passerby51 | Thanks for the reference. I will think more about the dual version. A more direct approach is also welcome. | |
| Feb 12, 2013 at 3:40 | comment | added | Mark Meckes | There is a dual formulation of Wasserstein distance which makes perfect sense for signed measures, although I don't know what pathological behaviors it might have in that generality. For comparison, this paper discusses the fact that if bounded-Lipschitz distance is extended in the obvious way to signed measures then it fails to be a complete metric: worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219493712003584 | |
| Feb 12, 2013 at 2:14 | history | asked | passerby51 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |