Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 18, 2010 at 16:03 comment added Harry Gindi Oh, that's such an overgeneralization. His sections on Galois theory and commutative algebra are among the best i've seen. I prefer Lang to Atiyah-MacDonald for commutative algebra for the most part.
Jan 18, 2010 at 15:46 answer added darij grinberg timeline score: 2
Jan 18, 2010 at 13:24 comment added darij grinberg Can't you say that about all of Lang's book?
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:02 comment added Harry Gindi There are three or four sections on elmination theory in Lang in chapter 9. They are a very tedious and hard-to-follow read.
Jan 17, 2010 at 21:39 vote accept Anweshi
Jan 17, 2010 at 21:33 vote accept Anweshi
Jan 17, 2010 at 21:33
Jan 17, 2010 at 21:19 answer added Chris Godsil timeline score: 5
Jan 17, 2010 at 21:11 comment added Qiaochu Yuan According to (half of the copies of) the Wikipedia article, Lagrange is supposed to have worked on determinants in relation to elimination theory, so perhaps you should look at a textbook specific to elimination theory instead.
Jan 17, 2010 at 20:56 history edited Anweshi CC BY-SA 2.5
added 127 characters in body
Jan 17, 2010 at 20:54 comment added Anweshi I am able to prove this statement itself in a very straightforward manner using axiomatic properties of the determinant. I am only worrying about the more general theorem.
Jan 17, 2010 at 20:47 comment added Steven Gubkin I don't know what theorem of Lagrange this follows from, but you are aware that this follows easily from the definition of the determinate as the unique alternating multilinear form on Mat_n(R) sending the identity to 1, right? Also see mth.kcl.ac.uk/~jrs/gazette/blocks.pdf
Jan 17, 2010 at 20:37 history asked Anweshi CC BY-SA 2.5