Timeline for Can one view the Independent Product in Probability categorially?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Feb 7, 2013 at 10:32 | vote | accept | Michael Greinecker | ||
| Feb 6, 2013 at 9:07 | answer | added | Uwe Franz | timeline score: 18 | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 7:21 | answer | added | Tom LaGatta | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 4:33 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | I agree with Martin; I think it is reasonable to think of product measure as analogous to the tensor product of noncommutative rings (which is neither the categorical product nor the categorical coproduct in the category of rings). | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 0:29 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | It is a monoidal structure, and probably cannot be recovered from the plain category. | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 23:09 | comment | added | Michael Greinecker | @Rabee Tourky: My impression is that most of this stuff can be done in terms of Markov kernels. Grabiszewski constructs his type spaces using kernels directly. The projective limit results underlying the Mertens-Zamir type construction of the universal type space as the space of coherent hierarchies can be proven by getting kernels as disintegrations and then applying the Ionescu-Tulcea theorem. The probability-valued functions used by Heifetz and Samet in their construction are equivalent to kernels... | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 22:42 | comment | added | Rabee Tourky | A slight aside. My impression, given what I'm presently working on, is that this is the approach of how people are thinking about Mertens-Zamir universal type structure. | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 21:41 | history | asked | Michael Greinecker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |