Timeline for On Weil's characters of type (A)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2013 at 23:05 | vote | accept | Hugo Chapdelaine | ||
| Jan 31, 2013 at 19:37 | comment | added | fherzig | see Patrikis' 2012 thesis: math.ias.edu/~patrikis/variationsoct2012.pdf (in particular, 5.1.3). the first proof given is the standard one (see Keerthi's answer below), but it also indicates a second proof. | |
| Jan 31, 2013 at 14:20 | history | edited | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 31, 2013 at 1:38 | answer | added | Keerthi Madapusi | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 30, 2013 at 20:16 | comment | added | David Loeffler | Fargues' article is indeed great in many ways but I don't find his proof of Proposition 1.12 all that clear -- he leaves a lot of checking to the reader. | |
| Jan 30, 2013 at 15:21 | answer | added | Junkie | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 30, 2013 at 14:49 | comment | added | Keerthi Madapusi | Also, do you mean Dirichlet's theorem, rather than Minkowski's? | |
| Jan 30, 2013 at 14:49 | comment | added | Keerthi Madapusi | See Laurent Fargues's great article 'Motives and automorphic forms: the potentially abelian case', available here: www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/~fargues/Motifs_abeliens.pdf It's Proposition 1.12. | |
| Jan 30, 2013 at 14:22 | history | asked | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |