Timeline for Why are some tilings introduced as geometrical objects, not graphs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2010 at 12:19 | answer | added | Douglas Zare | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 16, 2010 at 23:21 | answer | added | Joel David Hamkins | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 16, 2010 at 21:57 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | I'm not sure I understand. As a very general rule, passing from a particular set of points in Euclidean space to the corresponding graph is always a lossy process, so if there is more relevant information you don't want to discard it. | |
| Jan 16, 2010 at 21:52 | answer | added | David Eppstein | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 16, 2010 at 21:41 | comment | added | j.c. | I suspect you can clear up some of your confusion (as well as make your question more understandable) if you specify a mathematical definition of "tiling" that you're interested in as well as what parts of the definition you're dissatisfied with. | |
| Jan 16, 2010 at 21:21 | history | asked | Pontus Rehula | CC BY-SA 2.5 |