Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Jan 29, 2013 at 18:49 comment added dwan Thomas Scanlon: I do not see how Podewski's conjecture implies an answer to my question. My confusion is that for my field F, I usually have a polynomial f such that its value set f(F) (a definable subset of F) is neither finite nor co-finite and thus the field F is not minimal. For example, as you mention that Podewski's conjecture is true in positive characteristic. What this implies for my value gap question when F is an infinite algebraic extension of a finite field, the case of most interest to me. Can you explain in more detail?
Jan 29, 2013 at 10:53 comment added HJRW Thomas Scanlon - it seems to me you could post your comment as an answer.
Jan 29, 2013 at 6:18 comment added Thomas Scanlon This question is a special case of a problem which has been open for four decades: Is an infinite field $K$ for which every definable set $X \subseteq K$ is finite or cofinite [called a ``minimal field''] necessarily algebraically closed? See Podewski, Minimale Ringe, Math. Phys. Semesterber 22 (1975), no. 2, 193 – 197. It is known that a counterexample must have characteristic zero: Wagner, Minimal fields, J. Symbolic Logic 65 (2000), no. 4, 1833 – 1835.
Jan 29, 2013 at 6:03 history edited dwan CC BY-SA 3.0
updated with a multi-variable version.
Jan 29, 2013 at 5:59 comment added dwan I have updated this question with a multi-variate version, which seems newer, even in the case when the field F is the complex numbers.
Jan 29, 2013 at 5:58 history edited dwan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 22 characters in body; edited title
Jan 29, 2013 at 5:50 history edited dwan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 676 characters in body; added 195 characters in body
Jan 29, 2013 at 5:27 comment added Greg Kuperberg Note that when I asked a related question, Bjorn gave a non-rigorous argument that there should be counterexamples. I think that "no actual answer" is too pessimistic; one can conjecture with evidence that the answer is no. mathoverflow.net/questions/9863/…
Jan 29, 2013 at 5:06 comment added Noam D. Elkies So should this be closed as essentially a duplicate of MO6820?
Jan 29, 2013 at 4:29 comment added Gjergji Zaimi This question has appeared before with no actual answer mathoverflow.net/questions/6820/…
Jan 29, 2013 at 4:21 history edited dwan
edited tags
Jan 29, 2013 at 4:15 history asked dwan CC BY-SA 3.0