Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 29, 2013 at 15:48 answer added H A Helfgott timeline score: 2
Jan 29, 2013 at 15:12 comment added H A Helfgott Yes, Greg - I was being careless.
Jan 29, 2013 at 2:02 comment added Greg Martin When I do the inclusion-exclusion, I get a main term of $2x/\zeta(2)$ rather than $x/\zeta(2)$ - each of the ranges $n\le x$ and $n>x$ seems to contribute an $x/\zeta(2)$. Do you think that's right?
Jan 28, 2013 at 21:50 comment added H A Helfgott And thanks to Barry for the reference.
Jan 28, 2013 at 21:48 comment added H A Helfgott Micah - I think you are right in principle, but I am not sure that an explicit constant has been worked out in that case. Does the smoothing help at all, at least numerically?
Jan 28, 2013 at 21:47 comment added H A Helfgott Er, yes, $1/x$ was a typo for $1/x^2$.
Jan 28, 2013 at 21:46 history edited H A Helfgott CC BY-SA 3.0
blush
Jan 28, 2013 at 19:34 comment added Barry Cipra FWIW, there's an update to the Cohen-Dress paper (by Cohen, Dress, and El Marraki) available through ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2357309
Jan 28, 2013 at 18:31 comment added anon Perhaps we want f(t)=0 in the first case so the sum is always finite?
Jan 28, 2013 at 16:48 comment added Gerhard Paseman I'm with km. Indeed, for any set of integers n of positive density, I see the desired sum over that set as infinite. Gerhard "Ask Me About Unbounded Confusion" Paseman, 2013.01.28
Jan 28, 2013 at 15:25 comment added Micah Milinovich Since the generating function for square-free numbers is $\zeta(s)/\zeta(2s)$, I believe you can get an error of $o(\sqrt{x})$ by using the classical zero-free region for the zeta-function (even without smoothing the sum). To get an error like $O(x^{1/2-\delta})$ for some $\delta>0$ seems more or less equivalent to a quasi-Riemann hypothesis.
Jan 28, 2013 at 15:24 comment added user25235 There must be some typo since the sum in the question is $+ \infty$.
Jan 28, 2013 at 14:53 history asked H A Helfgott CC BY-SA 3.0