Timeline for Is there a maximum to the amount of disjoint non-measurable subsets of the unit interval with full outer measure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2016 at 12:04 | history | edited | Ramiro de la Vega | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed broken link
|
| Jan 23, 2013 at 13:56 | comment | added | Rami Luisto | Thank you, "it is easy when you know how to do it". I have to say that I find the answer quite astonishing. I would have found the answer "Any finite number can be found." almost natural, especially after the Banach-Tarski paradox, and I even might have accepted the answer "Countably infinite amount of such sets exist." with some peace of mind. But having a continuum of such sets feels just uncanny. I am confused and perplexed, but if I am to believe the words of Eliezer Yudkowsky, acknowledging confusion is an important part in finding understanding. | |
| Jan 23, 2013 at 13:42 | vote | accept | Rami Luisto | ||
| Jan 23, 2013 at 12:29 | history | answered | Ramiro de la Vega | CC BY-SA 3.0 |